Inquire: Call 0086-755-23203480, or reach out via the form below/your sales contact to discuss our design, manufacturing, and assembly capabilities.
Quote: Email your PCB files to Sales@pcbsync.com (Preferred for large files) or submit online. We will contact you promptly. Please ensure your email is correct.
Notes: For PCB fabrication, we require PCB design file in Gerber RS-274X format (most preferred), *.PCB/DDB (Protel, inform your program version) format or *.BRD (Eagle) format. For PCB assembly, we require PCB design file in above mentioned format, drilling file and BOM. Click to download BOM template To avoid file missing, please include all files into one folder and compress it into .zip or .rar format.
IPC-A-640 Standard: Complete Guide to Optical Fiber Assembly Acceptance
Fiber optic assemblies are unforgiving. Unlike copper wire harnesses where a slightly imperfect crimp might still conduct electricity, a contaminated fiber end face or improper splice can completely block light transmission. There’s no “good enough” with fiber—it either meets spec or it doesn’t work.
That’s why IPC developed IPC-A-640, the acceptance standard specifically for optical fiber, optical cable, and hybrid wiring harness assemblies. While most engineers are familiar with IPC-A-620 for copper wire harnesses, IPC-A-640 addresses the unique inspection and acceptance challenges that fiber optics present: microscopic contamination, precise connector geometry, fusion splice quality, and bend radius requirements that don’t apply to copper.
I’ve worked with both standards, and the transition from copper to fiber optic assemblies requires a different mindset. You can’t visually inspect a fiber end face with the naked eye—you need specialized equipment and training. This guide covers what you need to know about IPC-A-640: the class system, key acceptance criteria, inspection requirements, and how it relates to other IPC standards.
IPC-A-640, officially titled “Acceptance Requirements for Optical Fiber, Optical Cable, and Hybrid Wiring Harness Assemblies,” provides acceptance criteria for cable and wire harness assemblies that incorporate optical fiber technology. The standard was developed by IPC (Association Connecting Electronics Industries) to fill a gap that IPC-A-620 couldn’t address—the specialized requirements of fiber optic communications systems.
The standard covers fiber optic communications systems (FOCS) including single-mode and multimode fibers, various connector types, fusion and mechanical splices, and hybrid assemblies that combine optical fiber with traditional copper wiring.
IPC-A-640 Revision History
Revision
Release Date
Key Updates
Original
July 2017
First release, companion to IPC-D-640
Revision A
April 2022
Current revision, updated acceptance criteria, enhanced illustrations
The current revision is IPC-A-640A, released in April 2022. This standard is relatively new compared to established standards like IPC-A-610 or IPC-A-620, reflecting the more recent widespread adoption of fiber optics in aerospace, military, telecommunications, and industrial applications.
What IPC-A-640 Covers
The standard provides acceptance requirements for:
Optical Components:
Fiber optic connectors (SC, LC, ST, FC, MTP/MPO, and others)
Understanding the standard’s boundaries prevents misapplication:
Detailed test procedures — The standard references test methods but doesn’t provide step-by-step procedures
In-service acceptance — Criteria are for new assemblies, not aged or field-used hardware
Design requirements — That’s covered by IPC-D-640
Copper wire harness assemblies — Use IPC-A-620 for non-fiber wiring
PCB assembly acceptance — Use IPC-A-610 for populated circuit boards
IPC-A-640 Performance Classes Explained
Like other IPC acceptance standards, IPC-A-640 uses a three-class system to establish different levels of acceptance criteria based on the end-use application. The class system recognizes that a fiber optic assembly for a consumer device doesn’t need the same rigor as one destined for a spacecraft.
Class Definitions
Class 1 — General Electronic Products Products where basic functionality is the primary requirement. Cosmetic imperfections are acceptable if the assembly functions within specifications. Limited life expectancy is typical.
Class 2 — Dedicated Service Electronic Products Products requiring extended life and continuous performance. Uninterrupted service is desired but not critical. Higher workmanship standards than Class 1.
Class 3 — High-Performance / High-Reliability Electronic Products Products where continued high performance is critical and equipment downtime cannot be tolerated. End-use environments may be harsh. Most stringent acceptance criteria apply.
Space / Military / Hazardous Applications IPC-A-640A includes an Appendix A that defines additional requirements beyond Class 3 for space flight, military systems, and hazardous environment applications. These address unique concerns like outgassing, extreme thermal cycling, and radiation exposure.
IPC-A-640 Class Comparison
Aspect
Class 1
Class 2
Class 3
Primary Focus
Function
Extended Life
Continuous Reliability
End Face Cleanliness
Basic
Moderate
Stringent
Connector Geometry
Wider tolerance
Moderate
Tightest tolerance
Splice Loss Limits
Relaxed
Standard
Most demanding
Documentation
Basic
Standard
Comprehensive
Inspection Frequency
Sample
Higher sample or 100%
100% typical
Typical Industries
Consumer, basic industrial
Telecom, commercial
Aerospace, medical, military
Selecting the Appropriate Class
The customer or user specifies the class—not the manufacturer. If no class is specified in the contract, clarify before production begins. Defaulting to Class 2 may not be appropriate for fiber optic assemblies given the critical nature of optical performance.
Class 1 Applications:
Consumer fiber optic devices
Non-critical data links
Prototype or evaluation assemblies
Short-life industrial equipment
Class 2 Applications:
Commercial telecommunications
Enterprise networking equipment
Industrial automation systems
Broadcast and AV equipment
General medical equipment (non-life-critical)
Class 3 Applications:
Aerospace flight systems
Military communications and weapons systems
Medical life-support equipment
Submarine and undersea systems
Space flight hardware
Nuclear facility controls
Key IPC-A-640 Acceptance Criteria
Fiber optic acceptance differs fundamentally from copper wire inspection. While copper crimps and solder joints are evaluated visually, fiber optic performance depends on microscopic conditions at the connector end face and within splices that require specialized inspection equipment.
Connector End Face Inspection
The end face is where light couples between fibers. Contamination, scratches, or geometry problems here directly cause signal loss. IPC-A-640 defines acceptance criteria for end face conditions.
End Face Zones:
Fiber optic connector end faces are divided into zones for inspection purposes:
Zone
Description
Importance
Core Zone (Zone A)
The light-carrying center of the fiber
Most critical — defects here directly affect signal
Cladding Zone (Zone B)
Surrounding the core
Important for multimode, affects beam quality
Adhesive/Epoxy Zone (Zone C)
Ferrule-to-fiber bond area
Contamination can migrate to core
Contact Zone (Zone D)
Ferrule mating surface
Affects physical contact and geometry
Contamination Acceptance Criteria:
Defect Type
Class 1
Class 2
Class 3
Particles in Core Zone
Not allowed
Not allowed
Not allowed
Particles in Cladding Zone
Limited size
Smaller limit
Minimal
Scratches through Core
Not allowed
Not allowed
Not allowed
Surface scratches (not through core)
Limited
More limited
Most limited
Contamination in Contact Zone
Allowed with limits
More restricted
Most restricted
The specific dimensional limits vary by fiber type (single-mode vs. multimode) and connector style. Always reference the current revision of IPC-A-640 for exact specifications.
Ensures proper physical contact between mated connectors
Apex Offset
Distance from fiber core to sphere apex
Affects contact pressure distribution
Fiber Height/Protrusion
Fiber position relative to ferrule
Prevents air gap or fiber damage
Angle (for APC connectors)
Angled polish for return loss
Critical for high-return-loss applications
Geometry is typically measured with an interferometer, not visual inspection. IPC-A-640 references industry standards like IEC 61300 series for specific measurement methods and limits.
Fusion Splice Acceptance Criteria
Fusion splicing permanently joins two fibers by melting the ends together. IPC-A-640 provides visual acceptance criteria for fusion splices.
Acceptable Fusion Splice Characteristics:
Smooth, uniform splice region
No visible bubbles, inclusions, or voids
Fiber cores aligned (verified by loss measurement)
Protective sleeve properly applied and centered
Fusion Splice Defects:
Defect
Description
Acceptance
Bubbles/Voids
Air trapped in splice region
Defect all classes
Core offset
Visible misalignment of fiber cores
Defect if exceeds loss spec
Diameter mismatch
Visible difference in fiber diameters
Process indicator or defect depending on severity
Contamination
Particles or debris in splice
Defect all classes
Incomplete fusion
Fibers not fully joined
Defect all classes
Excessive bulge
Splice diameter significantly larger than fiber
Process indicator or defect depending on class
Splice loss (measured in dB) is the ultimate acceptance criterion. Visual inspection identifies obvious defects, but optical testing confirms performance.
Mechanical Splice Acceptance Criteria
Mechanical splices use alignment mechanisms rather than fusion to join fibers. They’re field-installable but typically have higher loss than fusion splices.
Acceptable Mechanical Splice Characteristics:
Index-matching gel properly distributed
Fibers fully inserted to stops
Locking mechanism properly engaged
No fiber damage visible
Bend Radius Requirements
Fiber optic cables have minimum bend radius requirements to prevent signal loss and fiber breakage. Bending fiber too tightly causes macrobend loss (light escapes the core) and can permanently damage the fiber.
Typical Bend Radius Requirements:
Fiber/Cable Type
Minimum Bend Radius (Static)
Minimum Bend Radius (Dynamic/Installation)
Standard single-mode fiber
15-25 mm
30-50 mm
Bend-insensitive single-mode
5-10 mm
10-15 mm
Standard multimode fiber
25-38 mm
50-75 mm
Armored cable
Per manufacturer spec
Usually 10-20x cable OD
Ribbon cable
Per manufacturer spec
Usually larger than individual fiber
IPC-A-640 requires compliance with manufacturer specifications and includes acceptance criteria for routing, cable ties, and support hardware that affect bend radius.
Cable and Harness Assembly Criteria
Strain Relief:
Boot properly installed and positioned
No exposed fiber at cable-to-connector transition
Strain relief device (if used) properly secured
Strength Member Termination:
Aramid yarn or other strength members properly dressed and secured
No loose or protruding fibers
Termination method per manufacturer specification
Cable Jacket:
No cuts, nicks, or damage exposing internal components
IPC-A-640 vs IPC-A-620: Understanding the Difference
Engineers familiar with IPC-A-620 for copper wire harnesses often ask how IPC-A-640 differs. While both are acceptance standards for cable assemblies, they address fundamentally different technologies.
Comparison Table: IPC-A-640 vs IPC-A-620
Aspect
IPC-A-640
IPC-A-620
Scope
Optical fiber and hybrid assemblies
Copper wire and cable assemblies
Termination Focus
Connector end faces, splices
Crimps, soldering, IDC
Primary Concerns
Light transmission, contamination, geometry
Electrical continuity, mechanical strength
Inspection Equipment
Fiber scope, interferometer, OTDR
Visual, microscope, pull testing
Test Methods
Optical loss, return loss
Continuity, hi-pot, pull force
Current Revision
Revision A (April 2022)
Revision E (October 2022)
Companion Standard
IPC-D-640 (design)
IPC-D-620 (not published, design in A-620)
When to Use Each Standard
Use IPC-A-640 when:
Assembly contains optical fiber (any amount)
Hybrid assemblies with fiber and copper
Fiber optic communications systems
Optical sensor cables
Use IPC-A-620 when:
Pure copper wire harness assemblies
No optical fiber present
Traditional electrical interconnects
Use Both when:
Complex assemblies with separate fiber and copper sections
Apply IPC-A-640 to fiber portions, IPC-A-620 to copper portions
IPC-A-640 vs IPC-D-640: Acceptance vs Design
IPC-A-640 and IPC-D-640 are companion documents—one covers design requirements, the other covers acceptance criteria.
Standard
IPC-D-640
IPC-A-640
Title
Design and Critical Process Requirements
Acceptance Requirements
Focus
How to design fiber optic assemblies
How to inspect finished assemblies
Content
Materials, processes, documentation
Visual criteria, test requirements
Primary Users
Design engineers, process engineers
Inspectors, quality engineers
Released
2016
2017 (Rev A: 2022)
IPC-D-640 tells you how to design the assembly correctly. IPC-A-640 tells you how to verify the finished product meets requirements. Using both ensures a complete quality system for fiber optic assemblies.
Inspection Equipment for IPC-A-640 Compliance
Unlike copper wire inspection where visual examination often suffices, fiber optic inspection requires specialized equipment.
Essential Inspection Equipment
Equipment
Purpose
Typical Use
Fiber Inspection Scope
View connector end faces
Contamination, damage inspection
Video Inspection Probe
Display end face on monitor
Training, documentation, detailed analysis
Interferometer
Measure connector geometry
Radius, apex offset, fiber height
Optical Power Meter
Measure light power
Loss testing, system verification
Light Source
Provide test signal
Used with power meter for loss measurement
OTDR
Locate faults, measure loss/length
Splice verification, troubleshooting
Visual Fault Locator
Visible red light through fiber
Continuity check, break location
Magnification Requirements
IPC-A-640A specifies magnification requirements based on what’s being inspected:
Create work instructions that reference IPC-A-640 for:
Incoming inspection of fiber components
In-process inspection during assembly
Final acceptance testing
Nonconformance handling
Documentation and traceability
Step 5: Integrate with Quality System
Link IPC-A-640 to your quality management system:
Reference in quality manual
Include in supplier requirements
Use for customer quality agreements
Document in process control plans
IPC-A-640 Resources and Where to Purchase
Where to Buy IPC-A-640
Source
URL
Notes
IPC Official Store
shop.ipc.org
PDF and hardcopy available
ANSI Webstore
webstore.ansi.org
Electronic format
Document Center
document-center.com
Authorized dealer
IHS Markit
global.ihs.com
Standards subscription available
Accuris (Techstreet)
store.accuristech.com
Electronic and print
Current pricing is approximately $200-350 depending on format and membership status. IPC members receive discounts.
Related IPC Standards
Standard
Title
Relationship
IPC-D-640
Design and Critical Process Requirements for Optical Fiber, Optical Cable and Hybrid Wiring
Companion design standard
IPC-A-620
Requirements and Acceptance for Cable and Wire Harness Assemblies
Copper wire harness acceptance
IPC-A-610
Acceptability of Electronic Assemblies
PCB assembly acceptance
IPC-HDBK-640
Guidelines for Optical Fiber, Optical Cable, Hybrid Wiring
Supplementary handbook
Other Useful Resources
Industry Standards:
IEC 61300 series — Fiber optic interconnecting devices and passive components
TIA-455 series (FOTP) — Fiber optic test procedures
TIA-568 — Commercial building telecommunications cabling
Training and Certification:
Fiber Optic Association (FOA) — thefoa.org
ETA International — eta-i.org
Connector and equipment manufacturer training programs
Reference Materials:
IPC-A-640A includes Excel spreadsheet verification and validation checklist
Color illustrations showing acceptable and defect conditions
Frequently Asked Questions About IPC-A-640
Is IPC-A-640 certification available like IPC-A-610 or IPC-A-620?
Currently, IPC does not offer a dedicated certification program for IPC-A-640 comparable to the CIS/CIT programs for IPC-A-610 or IPC-A-620. However, IPC may develop certification in the future as fiber optic assembly becomes more prevalent. In the meantime, companies typically use manufacturer training, FOA certification, or internal training programs with IPC-A-640 as the reference document. Always check with IPC for the latest training offerings.
How does IPC-A-640 address hybrid assemblies with both fiber and copper?
IPC-A-640 covers the fiber optic portions of hybrid assemblies. For the copper wire portions, IPC-A-620 applies. When building hybrid assemblies, apply each standard to its respective technology. The standards are designed to work together—there’s no conflict in requirements. Your work instructions should clearly identify which standard governs each portion of the assembly.
What’s the relationship between IPC-A-640 and IPC-D-640?
IPC-D-640 is the design standard; IPC-A-640 is the acceptance standard. Think of IPC-D-640 as telling you how to design and build fiber optic assemblies correctly, while IPC-A-640 tells you how to inspect and accept the finished product. They’re companion documents—using both provides complete coverage from design through acceptance. IPC-D-640 was released in 2016, followed by IPC-A-640 in 2017.
Can I use IPC-A-640 for field-installed fiber optic assemblies?
IPC-A-640 defines acceptance criteria for “new/beginning of life” hardware—assemblies as manufactured. The standard explicitly states it’s not intended to define “in service” acceptance criteria for hardware degraded by aging or use. For field installations, IPC-A-640 criteria can be applied to newly installed connectors and splices, but degradation assessment of existing fiber infrastructure may require different criteria agreed upon between user and supplier.
What inspection equipment do I need at minimum for IPC-A-640 compliance?
At minimum, you need a fiber inspection scope (at least 200X magnification for end face inspection), optical power meter with appropriate light source for loss testing, and proper cleaning supplies. For production environments, video inspection probes that display on monitors are preferred for documentation and training. If you’re verifying connector geometry (radius of curvature, apex offset), an interferometer is required. The specific equipment needs depend on your class requirements and the types of fiber assemblies you produce.
Conclusion
IPC-A-640 fills a critical need for fiber optic assembly acceptance criteria. As fiber optics expand into more applications—data centers, aerospace, autonomous vehicles, 5G infrastructure, and medical devices—having a standardized acceptance document becomes increasingly important.
The standard’s class system provides appropriate rigor for different applications, from consumer products to space flight hardware. Its companion relationship with IPC-D-640 creates a complete framework for fiber optic assembly quality, from design through final acceptance.
If your organization works with fiber optic assemblies and hasn’t yet adopted IPC-A-640, now is the time. The standard provides objective acceptance criteria that eliminate ambiguity, reduce disputes, and ensure consistent quality. Combined with proper training and equipment, IPC-A-640 gives your quality system the foundation it needs for fiber optic excellence.
For organizations already using IPC-A-620 for copper wire harnesses, IPC-A-640 is the natural extension when fiber optics enter your product mix. The class system and documentation philosophy are similar—the technical requirements simply address the unique challenges of optical technology.
Fiber optics aren’t going away. If anything, bandwidth demands and EMI considerations are driving more applications toward optical solutions. Having your quality system ready with IPC-A-640 positions your organization for this optical future.
Inquire: Call 0086-755-23203480, or reach out via the form below/your sales contact to discuss our design, manufacturing, and assembly capabilities.
Quote: Email your PCB files to Sales@pcbsync.com (Preferred for large files) or submit online. We will contact you promptly. Please ensure your email is correct.
Notes: For PCB fabrication, we require PCB design file in Gerber RS-274X format (most preferred), *.PCB/DDB (Protel, inform your program version) format or *.BRD (Eagle) format. For PCB assembly, we require PCB design file in above mentioned format, drilling file and BOM. Click to download BOM template To avoid file missing, please include all files into one folder and compress it into .zip or .rar format.