IPC-9851 Explained: Complete Guide to SMEMA Machine Interface for SMT Lines

Setting up an SMT line sounds straightforward until you try connecting a stencil printer from one vendor to a pick-and-place machine from another. The printer finishes a board and tries to send it downstream. The placement machine isn’t ready. The board sits there. Or worse, both machines think they’re ready simultaneously, and you get a collision at the conveyor handoff.

This is exactly the problem IPC-9851 solves. The standard defines how SMT equipment communicates during board transfers—the mechanical dimensions that ensure conveyors align, the electrical signals that coordinate “I have a board” and “I’m ready to receive,” and the timing that prevents collisions and jams.

If you’re integrating equipment from multiple vendors, troubleshooting line stoppages, or planning an upgrade to Industry 4.0 capabilities, understanding IPC-9851 is essential.

What Is IPC-9851?

IPC-9851, officially titled “IPC-SMEMA-9851 Mechanical Equipment Interface Standard,” defines the mechanical and electrical interface specifications for board transfer between SMT assembly equipment. Published in February 2007, it supersedes the earlier SMEMA 1.2 specification and remains the foundation for machine-to-machine communication in most SMT production lines worldwide.

The standard covers two critical aspects: the physical dimensions that ensure boards transfer smoothly between machines, and the electrical signals that coordinate when transfers occur.

History of SMEMA and IPC-9851

SMEMA—the Surface Mount Equipment Manufacturers Association—was founded in 1984 when North American equipment suppliers recognized that their machines needed to work together on customer production lines. Without standardization, every equipment combination required custom engineering.

The founding companies—including Dynapert, Zevatech, Universal Instruments, MPM, and BTU—established the core concepts that persist today: standardized conveyor dimensions and simple electrical handshaking signals.

IPC-9851 Mechanical Interface Specifications

The mechanical interface ensures that PCBs transfer smoothly from one machine’s exit conveyor to the next machine’s entry conveyor.

Conveyor Width Requirements

IPC-9851 specifies adjustable conveyor width to accommodate different board sizes:

The 50mm to 216mm range covers most standard PCB sizes, from small modules to larger mainboards. The independent adjustability for dual-lane configurations became increasingly important as manufacturers adopted parallel processing to increase throughput.

Board Transport Direction

The standard specifies left-to-right board flow as the default configuration, though the same specifications apply for right-to-left installations. This consistency simplifies line layout planning and equipment placement.

Dual-Lane Configuration

IPC-9851 added explicit dual-lane requirements that weren’t fully addressed in SMEMA 1.2:

Dual-lane capability allows processing two boards simultaneously, effectively doubling line capacity without doubling floor space.

IPC-9851 Electrical Interface Requirements

The electrical interface is where most integration challenges occur. IPC-9851 defines the signals, connectors, and electrical characteristics for board transfer coordination.

Signal Lines and Functions

Three signal lines coordinate board transfers:

The handshake is simple: when the upstream machine has a board ready (Board Available = active) AND the downstream machine can accept it (Machine Ready = active), the transfer occurs.

Connector Specifications

IPC-9851 specifies AMP Multimate connectors for the interface:

Each machine has both upstream (input) and downstream (output) connectors. The upstream connector receives signals from the previous machine; the downstream connector sends signals to the next machine.

Electrical Characteristics

The 30 VDC / 10 mA specification allows both relay-based and optocoupler-based implementations. This flexibility has occasionally caused compatibility issues when connecting equipment using different technologies.

Pin Assignments

The standard 14-pin connector uses the following assignments for a typical single-lane configuration:

Note that pin assignments can vary between manufacturers, particularly for dual-lane configurations. Always verify pinouts when connecting equipment from different vendors.

Read more IPC Standards:

MIL-PRF-38534: Hybrid Microcircuits Military Specification Guide for Engineers

MIL-PRF-31032: The Definitive Guide to Military-Grade PCB Requirements

MIL-PRF-19500: Military Semiconductor Device Specification Explained

MIL-PRF-123: High-Reliability Ceramic Capacitor Military Standard

MIL-I-46058CMIL-I-46058C: Military Conformal Coating Specification Complete Guide

MIL-HDBK-263: ESD Control Handbook & Implementation Guide

J-STD-075 Guide: PSL Classification for Passive Components & Assembly Process Limits

J-STD-035 Guide: Acoustic Microscopy for IC Package Inspection & Defect Detection

J-STD-033 Guide: MSD Handling, Floor Life, Baking & Dry Storage Requirements

J-STD-032 Explained: Ball Grid Array Ball Construction & Performance Specs

J-STD-027 Guide: Mechanical Outline Standard for Flip Chip & CSP Packages

J-STD-020 Guide: MSL Classification, Reflow Profiles & Moisture Sensitivity Testing

IPC/WHMA-A-620 Explained: Complete Guide to Cable & Wire Harness Standards

IPC-SG-141: Complete Guide to S-Glass Fabric Specifications for PCB Laminates

IPC-QF-143: Complete Guide to Quartz Fabric Specifications for RF/Microwave PCB Laminates

IPC-9851 Signal Timing and Logic

Understanding the signal timing prevents most board transfer problems.

Normal Transfer Sequence

A successful board transfer follows this sequence:

The critical timing parameter is the overlap period when both signals are active—this triggers the physical board transfer.

Signal Timing Requirements

The 50ms debounce prevents false triggers from electrical noise or contact bounce. This timing is critical when using relay-based interfaces.

Failed Board Handling

When the optional Failed Board Available signal is implemented:

This allows automatic routing of boards that failed inspection (AOI, SPI) to reject conveyors without stopping the line.

Common IPC-9851 Integration Issues

After years of working with SMEMA interfaces, certain problems appear repeatedly.

Optocoupler vs. Relay Polarity

The most common integration headache involves connecting optocoupler-based equipment to relay-based equipment:

Optocouplers are polarity-sensitive; relays are not. When a relay-based machine connects to an opto-based machine with reversed wiring, the protection diode conducts and the signal appears permanently active.

Signal Level Issues

Mechanical Alignment

IPC-9851 vs. IPC-HERMES-9852: Understanding the Transition

In 2018, IPC recognized The Hermes Standard as IPC-HERMES-9852, the next-generation successor to IPC-9851. Understanding the differences helps plan upgrade strategies.

Comparison Overview

What Hermes Adds

IPC-HERMES-9852 extends beyond simple board transfer coordination:

Coexistence and Migration

Most modern equipment supports both standards simultaneously:

SMEMA-to-Hermes adaptors allow legacy equipment to participate in Hermes-enabled lines by converting the discrete I/O signals to Hermes messages.

Implementing IPC-9851 in Your SMT Line

New Line Setup Checklist

Troubleshooting Quick Reference

Useful Resources for IPC-9851 Implementation

Official Standard and Documentation

Adaptor and Interface Products

Related IPC Standards

Frequently Asked Questions About IPC-9851

What is the difference between SMEMA and IPC-9851?

SMEMA refers to both the organization (Surface Mount Equipment Manufacturers Association) and its original interface specifications. IPC-9851 is the formal IPC standard that superseded SMEMA 1.2 when SMEMA merged with IPC in 1999. In practice, engineers often use “SMEMA” and “IPC-9851” interchangeably when referring to the interface standard. The key point is that IPC-9851 is the current official version, published in 2007, and includes updates like explicit dual-lane support that weren’t in the original SMEMA specifications.

Can I mix equipment using IPC-9851 and IPC-HERMES-9852 on the same line?

Yes, and this is the most common migration scenario. Modern equipment typically supports both protocols simultaneously. Machines communicate via Hermes when both support it, and fall back to SMEMA signals when connecting to legacy equipment. For older machines that only support SMEMA, adaptor devices can convert between the protocols. The key is ensuring the SMEMA electrical interface remains functional even when Hermes is the primary communication method—this provides redundancy if network issues occur.

Why do I get board transfer failures when connecting machines from different vendors?

The most common cause is signal polarity mismatch between optocoupler-based and relay-based interfaces. One vendor’s machine may use optocouplers for isolation, which are polarity-sensitive, while another uses relays that work regardless of polarity. If the wiring polarity doesn’t match the optocoupler orientation, signals appear stuck or inverted. Check the actual voltage at the receiving machine’s input pins—you should see close to 30 VDC when the signal is inactive (open) and less than 0.8 VDC when active (closed). Swapping the signal and return wires typically resolves this.

Is IPC-9851 obsolete now that IPC-HERMES-9852 exists?

No, IPC-9851 remains widely deployed and fully supported. While IPC-HERMES-9852 is recognized as the next-generation standard with significantly enhanced capabilities for Industry 4.0, the vast majority of installed SMT equipment uses SMEMA interfaces. Equipment manufacturers continue to include SMEMA support in new machines alongside Hermes capability. For basic board transfer coordination, SMEMA works perfectly well—Hermes becomes important when you need board-level traceability, automatic recipe management, or integration with manufacturing execution systems. Plan for Hermes capability in new equipment purchases, but don’t feel pressured to replace functional SMEMA-based lines.

How do I verify that my SMEMA interface is working correctly?

Start with a multimeter. Measure voltage between pin 1 and pin 2 (Machine Ready) at your machine’s upstream connector—you should see the downstream machine’s signal. With no board ready downstream, voltage should be near 30 VDC (open circuit). When the downstream machine is ready to receive, voltage should drop below 0.8 VDC (circuit closed). Repeat for Board Available (pins 3-4) at the downstream connector. If signals look correct but transfers still fail, check timing with an oscilloscope—the 50ms debounce and signal overlap during transfer are critical. Finally, perform a manual transfer test: with both machines in automatic mode but conveyors stopped, verify the signals change appropriately as you manually position a board.

Conclusion

IPC-9851 has been the backbone of SMT line communication for decades, and it continues to serve that role even as IPC-HERMES-9852 brings Industry 4.0 capabilities to the production floor. The standard’s strength lies in its simplicity—a few mechanical dimensions and two or three electrical signals are enough to coordinate board transfers between any compliant equipment.

For process engineers working with existing lines, understanding the mechanical specifications, electrical interface, and signal timing covered in this guide provides the foundation for successful equipment integration and efficient troubleshooting. For those planning new lines or upgrades, the transition path from IPC-9851 to IPC-HERMES-9852 offers a clear migration strategy that protects existing investments while enabling future capabilities.

Whether you’re connecting a new AOI machine to a legacy placement system or planning a complete line upgrade, IPC-9851 knowledge remains essential. The machines may get smarter, but the fundamental requirement—getting boards from one machine to the next without jams, collisions, or miscommunication—hasn’t changed.