Inquire: Call 0086-755-23203480, or reach out via the form below/your sales contact to discuss our design, manufacturing, and assembly capabilities.
Quote: Email your PCB files to Sales@pcbsync.com (Preferred for large files) or submit online. We will contact you promptly. Please ensure your email is correct.
Notes: For PCB fabrication, we require PCB design file in Gerber RS-274X format (most preferred), *.PCB/DDB (Protel, inform your program version) format or *.BRD (Eagle) format. For PCB assembly, we require PCB design file in above mentioned format, drilling file and BOM. Click to download BOM template To avoid file missing, please include all files into one folder and compress it into .zip or .rar format.
IPC-9701 Explained: Solder Joint Reliability & Thermal Cycling Test Guide
Your BGA passed all electrical tests and looked perfect under X-ray inspection. Six months into field deployment, customers start reporting failures. The root cause? Solder joint fatigue from thermal cycling—the constant heating and cooling that occurs every time the device powers on and off. The joints that looked flawless at assembly gradually cracked until they failed completely.
This scenario plays out repeatedly across the electronics industry. Solder joints are the weakest link in most electronic assemblies, and thermal cycling is their primary enemy. The temperature swings create mechanical stress from CTE mismatch between components and PCBs, and over thousands of cycles, that stress causes fatigue cracks that propagate until the joint fails electrically.
IPC-9701 provides the standardized methodology to characterize this failure mechanism before products reach the field. By subjecting test assemblies to accelerated thermal cycling and monitoring for failures, engineers can predict field reliability and identify design or process issues that would otherwise surface as warranty returns.
IPC-9701, officially titled Thermal Cycling Test Method for Fatigue Life Characterization of Surface Mount Attachments, establishes a standardized accelerated thermal cycling test method to characterize the fatigue lifetimes of SMT solder joints. The characterization results can predict field lifetime of solder attachments for various use environments and conditions.
Scope and Purpose
Aspect
Coverage
Equipment type
Surface mount solder attachments
Board types
Rigid, flexible, and rigid-flex printed boards
Primary focus
Thermal cycling fatigue life characterization
Output
Data for field lifetime prediction
The standard provides a characterization method and reporting procedure for use in studying processes and parameters, and for analytical prediction of solder joint reliability. It is not a pass/fail qualification standard—it’s a characterization methodology that generates data for reliability predictions.
Revision History
Version
Date
Key Content
IPC-SM-785
1992
Predecessor standard
Original
January 2002
Initial IPC-9701 release
Revision A
February 2006
Added Pb-free guidelines (Appendix B)
Revision B
February 2022
Current version, narrowed scope to characterization
The evolution from IPC-9701A to IPC-9701B reflects a deliberate narrowing of scope. Revision B focuses specifically on thermal cycle characterization, removing qualification language to better align with actual industry usage. Qualification decisions remain the responsibility of the user based on their specific application requirements.
Physics-of-Failure Concepts in IPC-9701
Understanding why solder joints fail under thermal cycling is essential to interpreting test results. IPC-9701 establishes the physics-of-failure foundation that drives the test methodology.
Differential Thermal Expansion (CTE Mismatch)
The fundamental driver of solder joint fatigue is the difference in coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) between the component package and the printed board.
Material
Typical CTE (ppm/°C)
Silicon die
2.6
Ceramic substrate
6-7
FR-4 PCB
14-17
Organic substrate (BGA)
15-20
Copper
17
When temperature changes, these materials expand and contract at different rates. The solder joints connecting them must absorb this mismatch, creating shear stress that accumulates with each thermal cycle.
Two forms of differential thermal expansion are recognized:
Type
Description
Global mismatch
CTE difference between entire component package and PCB
Local mismatch
CTE difference between component leads/balls and PCB pads
Creep and Stress Relaxation
Solder exhibits time-dependent deformation behavior that significantly affects fatigue life:
Phenomenon
Description
Impact
Creep
Gradual deformation under sustained stress at elevated temperature
Redistributes stress, affects fatigue damage
Stress relaxation
Gradual decrease in stress under constant strain
Reduces peak stress but doesn’t eliminate damage
Because of these time-dependent characteristics, fatigue damage in accelerated testing is not directly equivalent to field use. Acceleration factors must be applied to correlate test results with predicted field life.
Solder Creep-Fatigue Models
IPC-9701 references analytical models that estimate solder joint life under cyclic creep-fatigue conditions:
Model
Application
Coffin-Manson
Relates plastic strain range to fatigue life
Engelmaier
Modified Coffin-Manson for solder with temperature and frequency factors
Norris-Landzberg
Acceleration factor model for temperature cycling
These models enable engineers to extrapolate accelerated test results to predict field reliability under actual use conditions.
IPC-9701 Thermal Cycling Test Conditions
IPC-9701 defines specific temperature cycling profiles designated TC1 through TC5, each representing different severity levels and application environments.
Standard Test Conditions
Condition
Temperature Range
Typical Application
TC1
0°C to +100°C
Consumer electronics
TC2
-25°C to +125°C
Industrial equipment
TC3
-40°C to +125°C
Automotive under-hood
TC4
-55°C to +125°C
Military/aerospace
TC5
-55°C to +100°C
Space applications
Test Parameter Requirements
Parameter
Requirement
Dwell time
10 minutes minimum at temperature extremes
Ramp rate
≤20°C/minute (typically 10-14°C/minute)
Temperature tolerance
+0/-10°C at low temp, +10/-0°C at high temp
Cycle time
Determined by ramp rate and dwell times
The dwell time is particularly important. During the dwell at each temperature extreme, creep deformation occurs in the solder joints. Shorter dwells result in incomplete creep, which affects the correlation between accelerated test and field performance.
Cycle Duration Requirements
Requirement Level
Cycles
Application
NTC-A
200
Initial screening
NTC-B
500
Basic qualification
NTC-C
1,000
Standard reliability
NTC-D
3,000
High reliability
NTC-E
6,000
Extended life applications
The appropriate cycle count depends on the target application’s expected field life and the acceleration factor of the chosen test condition relative to field use.
IPC-9701 specifies requirements for test vehicles and electrical monitoring configurations to ensure meaningful, repeatable results.
Daisy Chain Configuration
The daisy chain is an electrically conductive path connecting solder joints in series to form a continuous circuit for monitoring:
Element
Purpose
Component daisy chain
Internal routing within package connecting balls/leads
PCB daisy chain
Board traces connecting component pads
Complete loop
Series connection enabling resistance monitoring
All solder joints on the package must be covered by the daisy chain, including ground and power connections. This ensures that any single joint failure will be detected electrically.
Test Vehicle Specifications
Parameter
Requirement
Sample size
32-33 components per test condition
PCB thickness
2.35mm typical (or as specified)
Surface finish
As relevant to production (HASL, ENIG, OSP, etc.)
Solder alloy
Match production process (SnPb or Pb-free)
The test vehicle should represent actual production conditions as closely as possible to ensure test results are applicable to real products.
Failure Criteria and Monitoring Methods
IPC-9701 defines specific criteria for determining when a solder joint has failed, enabling consistent data collection across different test facilities.
Electrical Failure Definitions
Method
Failure Definition
Event detector
Resistance exceeding 1000Ω for ≥1 microsecond
Data logger
20% resistance increase from initial value, occurring in 5+ consecutive readings
The event detector method captures brief intermittent opens that might be missed by periodic resistance readings. Many failures begin as intermittent events before becoming permanent opens.
Monitoring Requirements
Aspect
Specification
Monitoring type
Continuous monitoring preferred
Measurement frequency
Per test equipment capability
Data recording
Cycle count at each failure event
Initial testing
Verify no opens, shorts, or abnormal resistance before test
Continuous monitoring during thermal cycling, including at temperature extremes, is essential because failures often occur at the temperature extremes where stress is highest. Manual room-temperature checks between cycles may miss failures that occur only at temperature.
Weibull Statistical Analysis
IPC-9701 uses Weibull distribution to characterize the statistical nature of solder joint fatigue failures.
Key Weibull Parameters
Parameter
Symbol
Description
Characteristic life
η (eta)
Cycles at which 63.2% of population has failed
Shape parameter
β (beta)
Slope indicating failure rate behavior
Mean fatigue life
N(50%)
Cycles at which 50% of population has failed
Failure-free life
N₀
Minimum cycles before first failure expected
Interpreting Weibull Slope (β)
β Value
Interpretation
β < 1
Infant mortality (decreasing failure rate)
β = 1
Random failures (constant failure rate)
β > 1
Wear-out failures (increasing failure rate)
β = 2-4
Typical for solder joint fatigue
Solder joint thermal fatigue typically shows β values between 2 and 4, indicating wear-out failure mechanisms where failure rate increases over time as damage accumulates.
Pb-Free Solder Considerations
IPC-9701A introduced Appendix B specifically addressing Pb-free solder joint reliability testing. The transition from SnPb to SAC alloys introduced new considerations for thermal cycling performance.
SnPb vs Pb-Free Performance
Characteristic
SnPb (Sn63/Pb37)
SAC305 (Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu)
Melting point
183°C
217-220°C
Typical fatigue life
~3,000 cycles (baseline)
~2,000 cycles (TC1 conditions)
Creep behavior
Higher creep rate
Lower creep rate
Microstructure evolution
Relatively stable
Significant coarsening over time
Lead-free SAC alloys generally show shorter fatigue life than SnPb under identical test conditions. This must be considered when comparing historical SnPb data with current Pb-free results.
Mixed Solder Joint Considerations
Hybrid or mixed solder joints (e.g., SAC305 balls with SnPb paste) present unique reliability characteristics:
Configuration
Reliability Consideration
SAC ball + SAC paste
Homogeneous joint, predictable behavior
SAC ball + SnPb paste
Mixed microstructure, complex failure modes
SnPb ball + SAC paste
Less common, similar complexity
When testing mixed assemblies, ensure the test profile and analysis account for the specific solder joint metallurgy present.
Application Environments and Use Conditions
IPC-9701 provides guidance on mapping test conditions to actual product use environments.
Product Category Use Environments
Category
Environment
Typical ΔT
Expected Cycles/Year
Consumer portable
0°C to +60°C
35°C
365-1,000
Consumer stationary
+15°C to +55°C
20°C
365
Telecom indoor
0°C to +55°C
35°C
365
Automotive passenger
-40°C to +85°C
60°C
1,000-3,000
Automotive under-hood
-40°C to +125°C
100°C
1,000-3,000
Military ground
-55°C to +95°C
60°C
365
Space LEO
-55°C to +100°C
80°C
5,000+
Acceleration Factor Considerations
The ratio between accelerated test cycles and field cycles depends on multiple factors:
Factor
Impact
Temperature range
Larger ΔT = higher acceleration
Maximum temperature
Higher Tmax = faster damage accumulation
Dwell time
Longer dwell = more complete creep
Component/PCB CTE mismatch
Larger mismatch = higher acceleration
Acceleration factors typically range from 5x to 50x depending on test and field conditions.
What is the difference between IPC-9701 and JEDEC JESD22-A104?
Both standards address temperature cycling testing, but they serve different purposes. IPC-9701 focuses specifically on board-level solder joint reliability characterization with detailed guidance on daisy chain monitoring, Weibull analysis, and failure criteria. JEDEC JESD22-A104 is a broader component-level temperature cycling test method. For board-level solder joint reliability studies, IPC-9701 provides more comprehensive methodology. Many test programs reference both standards—JESD22-A104 for the basic temperature cycling profiles and IPC-9701 for solder joint monitoring and analysis requirements.
How do I choose between TC1, TC2, TC3, TC4, and TC5 test conditions?
Select the test condition that best represents your product’s intended use environment with appropriate acceleration. TC1 (0°C to 100°C) suits consumer electronics with moderate thermal exposure. TC3 (-40°C to 125°C) is standard for automotive applications. TC4 and TC5 (-55°C extremes) are appropriate for military, aerospace, and space applications. Consider both the actual field temperature range and the desired acceleration factor when selecting test conditions. Testing at harsher conditions than necessary wastes resources, while testing too mild may not reveal reliability issues.
What sample size is required for IPC-9701 testing?
IPC-9701 recommends 32-33 component samples per test condition. This sample size provides sufficient statistical confidence for Weibull analysis while remaining practical for test execution. Smaller sample sizes reduce confidence in the characteristic life estimate, while larger samples improve statistical precision but increase cost and test capacity requirements. For critical applications or when establishing new processes, consider larger sample sizes. For routine characterization, 32 samples per condition is typically adequate.
How does Pb-free solder reliability compare to SnPb under IPC-9701 testing?
Generally, SAC305 (Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu) lead-free solder shows shorter thermal cycling fatigue life than eutectic SnPb solder under identical test conditions—roughly 2,000 cycles versus 3,000 cycles at TC1 conditions, though this varies significantly with component type and design. However, Pb-free joints may perform better or worse depending on package type, board design, and specific test conditions. Do not assume historical SnPb data directly applies to Pb-free assemblies. IPC-9701A Appendix B provides specific guidance for Pb-free testing, and separate characterization is recommended when transitioning processes.
Can IPC-9701 results predict actual field reliability?
Yes, but with appropriate analysis. IPC-9701 test results provide accelerated failure data that must be converted to field predictions using acceleration factors. Models like Norris-Landzberg relate accelerated test conditions to field use conditions, accounting for temperature range, maximum temperature, and cycle frequency differences. The accuracy of field predictions depends on proper test condition selection, sufficient sample size, appropriate acceleration factor models, and understanding of actual field use conditions. Field correlation studies comparing predictions to actual returns improve confidence in the methodology for specific applications.
Implementing IPC-9701 in Reliability Programs
IPC-9701 testing should be integrated into broader product reliability programs rather than treated as a standalone activity.
Implementation Approach
Phase
Activities
Planning
Define test conditions based on application, determine sample size, specify test vehicle design
Test Vehicle Preparation
Design and fabricate daisy chain boards, assemble with production processes
Execute cycling per selected conditions, monitor continuously
Data Analysis
Record failures, generate Weibull plots, calculate characteristic life
Field Correlation
Apply acceleration factors, predict field reliability, validate with field data
Integration with Other Standards
For comprehensive board-level reliability assessment, IPC-9701 thermal cycling should be complemented with mechanical testing per IPC/JEDEC-9702 (bend), IPC/JEDEC-9703 (shock), and IPC/JEDEC-9704 (strain gage). Together, these standards address the primary failure mechanisms affecting solder joint reliability in field applications, providing a complete picture of assembly robustness for qualification and process development purposes.
This article provides an overview of IPC-9701 principles and methodology. For complete test procedures, failure criteria specifications, and statistical analysis requirements, purchase the standard directly from IPC at shop.ipc.org.
Inquire: Call 0086-755-23203480, or reach out via the form below/your sales contact to discuss our design, manufacturing, and assembly capabilities.
Quote: Email your PCB files to Sales@pcbsync.com (Preferred for large files) or submit online. We will contact you promptly. Please ensure your email is correct.
Notes: For PCB fabrication, we require PCB design file in Gerber RS-274X format (most preferred), *.PCB/DDB (Protel, inform your program version) format or *.BRD (Eagle) format. For PCB assembly, we require PCB design file in above mentioned format, drilling file and BOM. Click to download BOM template To avoid file missing, please include all files into one folder and compress it into .zip or .rar format.
