IPC-9641 Explained: High Temperature PCB Flatness Testing for BGA Assembly

Anyone who has spent time troubleshooting BGA assembly defects knows the frustration of boards that measure perfectly flat at room temperature but cause head-in-pillow defects and open joints during reflow. For years, the industry relied on IPC-TM-650 Method 2.4.22 bow and twist measurements taken at room temperature, assuming that if a board was flat before assembly, it would stay flat during assembly. That assumption cost countless yield points and rework hours.

IPC-9641 exists because PCB engineers finally got tired of chasing assembly ghosts. The standard provides a methodology for measuring what actually matters: how your board behaves at the temperatures where solder joints form. When that BGA is sitting on molten solder at 260°C, what is the board doing underneath it? Is it warping concave, convex, or developing complex shapes that prevent proper joint formation?

This guide explains what IPC-9641 covers, why high-temperature flatness measurement matters, and how to implement testing that actually predicts assembly success.

What Is IPC-9641? Understanding the Standard

IPC-9641, released in June 2013, is titled “High Temperature Printed Board Flatness Guideline.” The 32-page document provides guidance for measuring PCB shape and flatness through simulated reflow temperature cycles, focusing particularly on local areas of interest like BGA and FCBGA land patterns.

The standard emerged from work by the IPC 6-11 Printed Board Coplanarity Subcommittee, formed in early 2012 when industry members recognized a critical gap. JEDEC had established component warpage specifications at elevated temperatures (JEITA ED-7306), but no corresponding standard existed for the PCB side of the assembly interface. Boards were being qualified using room temperature measurements while components were specified at reflow temperatures.

IPC-9641 addresses several key areas that room temperature testing cannot capture. These include selecting appropriate measurement equipment for high-temperature operation, planning test methodology across reflow temperature profiles, preparing PCB samples including moisture considerations, performing measurements at specific temperatures throughout the reflow cycle, and reporting local area warpage results with statistical validity.

How IPC-9641 Differs from Traditional Bow and Twist Testing

The relationship between IPC-9641 and traditional testing represents a fundamental shift in how the industry approaches PCB flatness.

Traditional bow and twist testing tells you how flat your board is when it’s sitting on the shelf. IPC-9641 tells you how flat it will be when solder is molten and joints are forming.

Why Room Temperature PCB Flatness Testing Falls Short

The physics of PCB behavior during reflow makes room temperature measurements fundamentally inadequate for predicting assembly success. PCBs are composite structures with multiple materials having different coefficients of thermal expansion. As temperature increases, these materials expand at different rates, causing the board to change shape.

The Dynamic Nature of PCB Warpage

A board that measures flat at 25°C might warp convex at 150°C, go flat again at 200°C, and warp concave at 260°C peak temperature. The worst-case deviation might occur at room temperature, peak temperature, or anywhere in between, and you won’t know unless you measure across the thermal profile.

Consider what happens during BGA attachment. As the board heats through reflow, the solder paste melts and the solder balls on the component become liquid. At this critical moment, the component and PCB land area must be close enough for surface tension to pull the solder into proper joints. If the PCB warps away from the component at this temperature, you get head-in-pillow defects, open joints, or bridging.

The iNEMI PCB Coplanarity study (2009-2011) measured real products from desktop, notebook, workstation, and server segments. The data showed that PCB local area warpage varied significantly across temperatures, and boards that looked acceptable at room temperature often exhibited problematic warpage at reflow temperatures.

Assembly Defects Caused by High-Temperature PCB Warpage

These defects often pass initial inspection but fail in the field under thermal cycling, making root cause analysis particularly challenging.

IPC-9641 Measurement Methodology

The standard outlines a systematic approach to characterizing PCB flatness behavior across reflow temperatures.

Measurement Equipment for High-Temperature PCB Warpage

IPC-9641 recognizes shadow moiré as the primary technique for high-temperature warpage measurement. Shadow moiré is a non-contact, full-field optical method that uses geometric interference between a reference grating and its shadow on the sample surface to measure vertical displacement at each pixel position.

Key equipment capabilities required include operation from room temperature through 260°C or higher, controlled heating with programmable temperature profiles, full-field surface measurement (not just point measurements), resolution sufficient to detect warpage in the micron range, and local area extraction capability for BGA site analysis.

Major equipment vendors include Akrometrix (TherMoiré systems: AXP, PS200, PS600), which developed much of the shadow moiré technology used in the industry. Their systems were used to generate data for both JEDEC component standards and IPC-9641 development.

Temperature Profile and Measurement Points

IPC-9641 recommends measuring at multiple temperatures across a simulated reflow profile rather than just at room temperature and peak. The standard provides example profiles with suggested measurement points.

A typical measurement sequence includes room temperature baseline before heating, preheat zone temperature (approximately 150°C), soak zone temperature (approximately 180-200°C), approach to peak (approximately 230°C), peak reflow temperature (approximately 260°C for lead-free), and cooling measurements at the same temperatures.

The ramp rate should be as high as possible while maintaining acceptable temperature gradient across the sample. Fast ramps reduce test time but may cause temperature non-uniformity that affects measurement accuracy.

Local Area vs. Global PCB Measurement

A critical concept in IPC-9641 is the focus on local area warpage, not just global board flatness. A board might have acceptable global bow and twist while having severe local warpage at a specific BGA site.

The standard recommends measuring both global PCB flatness (full board) and local areas of interest (specific BGA land patterns). The local area measurement extracts the surface data for just the component attachment zone and calculates coplanarity for that specific region.

Read more IPC Standards:

MIL-PRF-38534: Hybrid Microcircuits Military Specification Guide for Engineers

MIL-PRF-31032: The Definitive Guide to Military-Grade PCB Requirements

MIL-PRF-19500: Military Semiconductor Device Specification Explained

MIL-PRF-123: High-Reliability Ceramic Capacitor Military Standard

MIL-I-46058CMIL-I-46058C: Military Conformal Coating Specification Complete Guide

MIL-HDBK-263: ESD Control Handbook & Implementation Guide

J-STD-075 Guide: PSL Classification for Passive Components & Assembly Process Limits

J-STD-035 Guide: Acoustic Microscopy for IC Package Inspection & Defect Detection

J-STD-033 Guide: MSD Handling, Floor Life, Baking & Dry Storage Requirements

J-STD-032 Explained: Ball Grid Array Ball Construction & Performance Specs

J-STD-027 Guide: Mechanical Outline Standard for Flip Chip & CSP Packages

J-STD-020 Guide: MSL Classification, Reflow Profiles & Moisture Sensitivity Testing

IPC/WHMA-A-620 Explained: Complete Guide to Cable & Wire Harness Standards

IPC-SG-141: Complete Guide to S-Glass Fabric Specifications for PCB Laminates

IPC-QF-143: Complete Guide to Quartz Fabric Specifications for RF/Microwave PCB Laminates

Sample Preparation and Pre-Bake Considerations

IPC-9641 addresses a factor that significantly affects warpage results: moisture content. PCBs absorb moisture from the environment, and this moisture affects how the board warps during heating.

The Impact of Moisture on PCB Warpage

Absorbed moisture increases the magnitude of warpage during thermal excursion. A board that has been sitting in ambient conditions will behave differently than the same board after a drying bake. The standard notes that depending on moisture levels, PCBs may require a pre-bake process before testing.

Industry experience suggests that a 12-hour bake at 125°C effectively removes moisture to a consistent minimum level. This controls one major variable affecting thermally-induced warpage and improves measurement repeatability.

However, there’s a trade-off to consider. If production boards don’t receive a pre-bake before actual reflow assembly, testing pre-baked samples might not represent real assembly conditions. The wider range of warpage from non-baked boards might better represent what happens in production.

The decision depends on the purpose of testing. For design characterization, controlled conditions with pre-bake provide cleaner data. For production lot acceptance, matching actual assembly conditions might be more appropriate.

Statistical Sample Size Requirements

IPC-9641 recommends testing a minimum number of PCBs to establish the performance characteristics of a lot. Based on industry experience, the warpage tendency of a particular PCB lot usually becomes clear once 10 samples have been measured.

Testing more samples increases confidence that a representative range and standard deviation have been established. For critical applications, statistical process control approaches may require larger sample sizes to detect process shifts.

IPC-9641 Data Reporting and Analysis

The standard provides guidance on reporting warpage results in ways that enable meaningful comparison and decision-making.

Coplanarity and Signed Warpage

Two key metrics appear in IPC-9641 reporting. Coplanarity is the maximum deviation from a reference plane, typically a least-squares fit plane through the measured surface. Signed warpage indicates whether the surface is concave (negative) or convex (positive) relative to the reference.

The coplanarity ratio, developed during the iNEMI study, enables comparison across different board and component sizes. A 1000 µm coplanarity on a 150x200mm board has different implications than the same coplanarity on a 25x25mm BGA site.

Shape Matching with Component Warpage

One of the most valuable applications of IPC-9641 data is shape matching with component warpage data from JEDEC testing. By measuring both the component and the PCB local area at the same temperatures, engineers can calculate the gap between mating surfaces throughout the reflow cycle.

If component warpage data shows convex behavior at peak temperature and PCB local area data shows concave behavior, the gap between them will be larger than either individual warpage value. This gap analysis directly predicts solder joint formation potential.

Relationship to JEDEC Component Warpage Standards

IPC-9641 completes a picture that JEDEC standards only partially addressed. JEITA ED-7306 (Measurement Methods of Package Warpage at Elevated Temperature) specifies component warpage requirements, but without corresponding PCB specifications, only half the assembly interface was characterized.

Component vs. PCB Warpage Specifications

Notably, IPC-9641 provides guidance rather than mandatory limits. The appropriate warpage specification depends on the component being attached, the solder paste height, and the specific assembly process. What works for a large-pitch BGA will not work for a fine-pitch FCBGA.

Practical Implementation: Preventing BGA Assembly Defects

Implementing IPC-9641 testing provides data that directly correlates with assembly success. The workflow typically involves several stages.

Design and Development Phase

During PCB design, simulate warpage behavior using finite element analysis with material properties and stackup information. After receiving prototype boards, measure actual warpage at temperature to validate simulation predictions and identify any design modifications needed.

Supplier Qualification

Require PCB suppliers to provide high-temperature flatness data as part of qualification. Establish acceptance criteria based on the components being assembled and historical yield data. Include local area warpage specifications in procurement documents.

Production Lot Acceptance

For ongoing production, establish a statistical sampling plan to monitor lot-to-lot consistency. Measure incoming boards and track trends. Correlate warpage data with assembly yield to refine acceptance criteria.

Failure Analysis

When assembly defects occur, measure the PCB and component warpage at temperature to understand the gap behavior during reflow. This data often reveals root causes that room temperature inspection cannot detect.

Useful Resources for IPC-9641 Implementation

Official IPC Standards:

• IPC-9641 High Temperature Printed Board Flatness Guideline (shop.ipc.org) – approximately $85
• IPC-TM-650 Method 2.4.22 Bow and Twist (free from IPC)
• IPC-A-610 Acceptability of Electronic Assemblies

Related JEDEC/JEITA Standards:

• JEITA ED-7306 Package Warpage Measurement at Elevated Temperature
• JEDEC JESD22-B112 Package Warpage Measurement
• J-STD-020 Moisture/Reflow Sensitivity Classification

Equipment and Testing Services:

• Akrometrix (akrometrix.com) – Shadow moiré systems and testing services
• Test service laboratories offering IPC-9641 testing

Industry Research:

• iNEMI PCB Coplanarity Study reports
• IPC APEX EXPO technical papers on warpage
• Circuits Assembly magazine warpage articles

Frequently Asked Questions About IPC-9641

What is the difference between IPC-9641 and IPC-TM-650 Method 2.4.22?

IPC-TM-650 Method 2.4.22 measures bow and twist at room temperature only, providing a single snapshot of global board flatness. IPC-9641 measures local area flatness across a range of temperatures simulating the reflow profile, capturing how the board shape changes dynamically during assembly. The traditional method tells you if a board is flat on the shelf; IPC-9641 tells you if it will be flat when solder joints are forming at 260°C.

Does IPC-9641 replace room temperature flatness testing?

No, IPC-9641 complements rather than replaces room temperature testing. Room temperature bow and twist per IPC-TM-650 2.4.22 remains valuable for incoming inspection and basic quality control. IPC-9641 adds the thermal dimension for applications where assembly yield is affected by high-temperature behavior, particularly for BGA and fine-pitch components. Many organizations use room temperature testing for lot acceptance screening and reserve high-temperature testing for design qualification and failure analysis.

What equipment is needed to perform IPC-9641 testing?

The primary requirement is a shadow moiré measurement system capable of operation through reflow temperatures. Akrometrix TherMoiré systems (PS200, PS600, AXP series) are the industry standard, with systems ranging from bench-top units for component testing to large-format systems handling panels up to 600x600mm. The investment is significant (typically $100,000+), which is why many organizations outsource high-temperature warpage testing to service laboratories rather than building in-house capability.

How many samples should be tested to characterize a PCB design?

IPC-9641 recommends testing enough boards to establish representative performance characteristics. Based on industry experience, the warpage tendency of a lot typically becomes clear after measuring 10 samples. For initial design characterization, 10-20 boards from multiple fabrication lots provides good understanding of expected variation. For production lot acceptance, a statistical sampling plan based on lot size and acceptable quality levels should be established.

What causes PCB warpage to change at elevated temperatures?

PCBs are composite structures containing materials with different coefficients of thermal expansion (CTE). Copper, resin, glass reinforcement, and surface finishes all expand at different rates as temperature increases. Additionally, internal stresses from the lamination process may relax at elevated temperatures, and moisture absorbed by the laminate vaporizes and affects dimensional behavior. The result is complex, temperature-dependent shape changes that cannot be predicted from room temperature measurements alone.

Building a Complete Warpage Picture

IPC-9641 provides the methodology to understand what your PCB actually does during assembly, not just what it looks like at room temperature. Combined with component warpage data from JEDEC standards, engineers can now characterize both sides of the solder joint interface and predict assembly success before committing to production.

The standard represents a maturation of the industry’s approach to PCB flatness. Rather than assuming that room temperature measurements predict high-temperature behavior, IPC-9641 requires measuring what matters: shape at the temperatures where solder joints form. For anyone fighting head-in-pillow defects, mysterious open joints, or inconsistent BGA yields, high-temperature flatness characterization per IPC-9641 often reveals the root cause that room temperature inspection missed.

As package pitches continue to shrink and component warpage budgets tighten, the PCB’s contribution to the assembly interface becomes increasingly critical. IPC-9641 provides the tools to quantify that contribution and make informed decisions about design, materials, and process optimization.