Inquire: Call 0086-755-23203480, or reach out via the form below/your sales contact to discuss our design, manufacturing, and assembly capabilities.
Quote: Email your PCB files to Sales@pcbsync.com (Preferred for large files) or submit online. We will contact you promptly. Please ensure your email is correct.
Notes: For PCB fabrication, we require PCB design file in Gerber RS-274X format (most preferred), *.PCB/DDB (Protel, inform your program version) format or *.BRD (Eagle) format. For PCB assembly, we require PCB design file in above mentioned format, drilling file and BOM. Click to download BOM template To avoid file missing, please include all files into one folder and compress it into .zip or .rar format.
When a standard PCB antenna’s 2-3 dBi gain isn’t enough, you need a high gain PCB antenna design. I’ve worked on projects where every extra dB of antenna gain meant the difference between a working product and one that couldn’t maintain a reliable link. The good news is that achieving 8, 10, or even 15+ dBi from a PCB-based antenna is entirely possible—if you understand the techniques and tradeoffs involved.
This guide covers everything you need to design a high gain PCB antennafor your application. I’ll explain the techniques that actually increase gain (and by how much), provide practical array layouts with dimensions, and help you select the right substrate material. Whether you need 6 dBi for a WiFi access point or 15 dBi for a point-to-point link, these design approaches will get you there.
Problem: Using substrate wavelength instead of free-space wavelength for spacing. Effect: Elements too close, mutual coupling, reduced gain. Solution: Calculate spacing using free-space wavelength (c/f), not substrate wavelength.
Mistake 3: Feed Network Losses Ignored
Problem: Designing array without accounting for power divider and transmission line losses. Effect: Actual gain 2-3 dB below expected. Solution: Budget 0.5-1.5 dB loss for feed network, use wider traces, minimize length.
Mistake 4: FR4 at High Frequencies
Problem: Using FR4 above 3 GHz without accounting for increased loss. Effect: Efficiency drops below 60%, gain significantly reduced. Solution: Switch to Rogers or PTFE substrate for frequencies above 3 GHz.
Mistake 5: Phase Errors in Arrays
Problem: Unequal feed line lengths causing phase mismatch between elements. Effect: Beam squinting, reduced gain, pattern distortion. Solution: Ensure all feed paths have equal electrical length, account for bends.
High Gain PCB Antenna Design Resources
Simulation and Design Tools
Tool
Purpose
Cost
Notes
HFSS (Ansys)
Full-wave EM simulation
Commercial
Industry standard
CST Studio
Full-wave EM simulation
Commercial
Alternative to HFSS
ADS (Keysight)
Circuit + EM simulation
Commercial
Good for feed networks
openEMS
Open-source EM simulation
Free
MATLAB/Octave based
MATLAB Antenna Toolbox
Array synthesis
Commercial
Good for arrays
4NEC2
Wire antenna simulation
Free
Good for Yagi design
PCB Substrate Suppliers
Supplier
Materials
Website
Rogers Corporation
RO4003C, RO4350B, RT5880
rogerscorp.com
Taconic
TLY, RF-35
taconic.com
Isola
Astra MT77, I-Tera
isola-group.com
Arlon
AD series, DiClad
arlon-med.com
Reference Designs and Application Notes
Resource
Source
Content
AN-00501
Linx Technologies
Patch antenna design basics
DN023/DN024
Texas Instruments
WiFi PCB antenna reference
Antenna Magus
Software
Validated antenna templates
IEEE Xplore
Papers
High-gain array research
Impedance Calculators
Tool
Purpose
URL
Saturn PCB Toolkit
Microstrip impedance
saturnpcb.com
AppCAD
RF calculations
keysight.com
Mantaro Calculator
Trace width
mantaro.com
QUCS
Circuit simulation
qucs.sourceforge.net
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the maximum gain achievable from a PCB antenna?
Practical high gain PCB antenna designs can achieve 20-22 dBi with 8×8 element arrays at frequencies like 5.8 GHz. At lower frequencies, the physical size becomes the limiting factor—a 20 dBi antenna at 433 MHz would require a PCB over 1 meter square. The theoretical limit depends on the aperture size: gain ≈ 4πA/λ², where A is the physical area. For a 200×200 mm PCB at 2.4 GHz, the maximum theoretical gain is approximately 23-24 dBi. Real-world designs achieve 80-90% of this theoretical maximum due to efficiency losses, feed network losses, and edge effects. For most applications, 15-18 dBi represents a practical upper limit before the PCB size becomes unwieldy.
Can I achieve high gain with FR4 substrate?
Yes, but with limitations. FR4’s loss tangent (0.02) reduces efficiency by 10-20% compared to low-loss materials like Rogers. At 2.4 GHz, you can reasonably achieve 12-14 dBi with FR4 using a 4×4 patch array. Above 5 GHz, FR4 losses become more significant, and you’ll lose 2-3 dB compared to low-loss substrates. For prototyping and cost-sensitive applications below 3 GHz, FR4 is acceptable if you budget for the efficiency loss. For production designs requiring maximum performance, especially above 3 GHz, invest in Rogers RO4003C or similar low-loss materials. The cost premium is typically 3-5× for the substrate, but the performance improvement justifies it for gain-critical applications.
How much gain does each additional array element add?
Doubling the number of elements theoretically adds 3 dB of gain. A 2×2 array (4 elements) should provide +6 dB over a single element, and a 4×4 array (16 elements) should provide +12 dB. In practice, you’ll achieve 80-90% of this due to feed network losses and mutual coupling. So a realistic expectation is: 2 elements = +2.5 dB, 4 elements = +5 dB, 8 elements = +7.5 dB, 16 elements = +10 dB. The feed network becomes increasingly critical as array size grows—poorly designed networks can waste 1-2 dB of the potential gain increase. Use wider transmission lines (lower loss), minimize feed path length, and consider substrate-integrated waveguide (SIW) for very large arrays.
What is the best element spacing for a PCB antenna array?
Use half-wavelength (λ/2) spacing measured in free-space wavelength, not substrate wavelength. This is the most common mistake in array design. At 2.4 GHz, λ/2 is 62.5 mm—use this value regardless of substrate dielectric constant. The substrate wavelength only affects the individual patch dimensions, not the array spacing. Spacing less than 0.4λ causes excessive mutual coupling, reducing gain and increasing pattern distortion. Spacing greater than 0.7λ creates grating lobes that reduce gain in the main beam direction. For most applications, 0.5λ to 0.6λ provides the best balance of gain, beamwidth, and sidelobe performance. If space is constrained, 0.45λ is the absolute minimum for acceptable performance.
How does beamwidth change with increasing gain?
Higher gain means narrower beamwidth—there’s no escaping this fundamental relationship. Approximate beamwidths: 6 dBi = 70-90°, 10 dBi = 40-50°, 15 dBi = 20-30°, 20 dBi = 10-15°. This has significant implications for your application. A high-gain antenna for a point-to-point link (narrow beam acceptable) differs from one for a base station covering a sector (wider beam needed). For mobile devices or situations where orientation varies, high gain can actually hurt performance because the narrow beam may not point at the target. Consider your use case carefully—sometimes two separate 10 dBi antennas covering different sectors outperform a single 15 dBi antenna with a narrow beam pointing the wrong direction.
Conclusion
Designing a high gain PCB antenna requires balancing multiple factors: antenna type selection, array configuration, substrate material, and feed network optimization. The techniques outlined in this guide can take you from a basic 2-3 dBi monopole to a sophisticated 15+ dBi array—the approach depends on your specific requirements for gain, size, cost, and radiation pattern.
Start by determining your minimum gain requirement based on link budget analysis. If you need 10+ dBi, you’re looking at array designs. For 6-9 dBi, single-element patches, stacked patches, or Yagi antennas are practical options. Pay careful attention to element spacing (use free-space wavelength), feed network design, and substrate selection—these details separate working designs from disappointing ones.
For critical applications, invest in electromagnetic simulation during the design phase. Tools like HFSS, CST, or even free options like openEMS can predict performance before fabrication. Validate with measurements using a VNA and antenna range or anechoic chamber. The effort invested in proper design and verification pays dividends in achieving your gain targets reliably and consistently across production units.
Inquire: Call 0086-755-23203480, or reach out via the form below/your sales contact to discuss our design, manufacturing, and assembly capabilities.
Quote: Email your PCB files to Sales@pcbsync.com (Preferred for large files) or submit online. We will contact you promptly. Please ensure your email is correct.
Notes: For PCB fabrication, we require PCB design file in Gerber RS-274X format (most preferred), *.PCB/DDB (Protel, inform your program version) format or *.BRD (Eagle) format. For PCB assembly, we require PCB design file in above mentioned format, drilling file and BOM. Click to download BOM template To avoid file missing, please include all files into one folder and compress it into .zip or .rar format.