IPC-9850 Explained: Complete Guide to SMT Pick-and-Place Machine Accuracy Testing

If you’ve ever tried to compare pick-and-place machines from different vendors, you know the frustration. One manufacturer quotes 25,000 CPH with ±0.05mm accuracy. Another claims 30,000 CPH with ±0.04mm. But when you get the machines on your floor, the real-world performance tells a completely different story. The specifications were measured under different conditions, using different components, with different definitions of what “accuracy” even means.

IPC-9850 exists to solve this problem. It establishes standardized test methods so you can compare placement equipment on equal footing. More importantly, it gives you the tools to verify that a machine actually performs to its published specifications—not just when it’s new, but throughout its operational life.

Understanding IPC-9850 is essential for anyone involved in selecting, qualifying, or maintaining SMT placement equipment.

What Is IPC-9850?

IPC-9850, officially titled “Surface Mount Placement Equipment Characterization,” is an industry standard developed by IPC (Association Connecting Electronics Industries) to standardize how pick-and-place machine performance is measured and reported. The standard was first published in July 2002 by the IPC SMEMA committee, with the current revision IPC-9850A released in December 2011.

The standard defines the parameters, measurement procedures, and methodologies used for specifying, evaluating, and verifying assembly equipment throughput and accuracy. It provides equipment manufacturers with a common framework for reporting machine capabilities and gives users objective methods to compare different machines and verify performance claims.

Why IPC-9850 Matters for SMT Manufacturing

Before IPC-9850, placement machine vendors specified performance according to their own internal standards. This created significant problems for equipment purchasers.

The standard separates machine performance evaluation from other SMT process variables. By using standardized components placed on sticky media on glass panels, IPC-9850 isolates the placement machine’s contribution to overall process variation. This methodology removes variables like solder paste printing, reflow, and board quality from the equation.

IPC-9850 Key Performance Metrics

The standard defines several metrics that together characterize placement equipment capability.

Placement Accuracy: X, Y, and Theta

The most fundamental metric is placement accuracy, defined by three parameters:

These parameters describe how far the placed component deviates from its intended position. IPC-9850 requires measuring all three and reporting them statistically, including mean offset and standard deviation.

Maximum Lead Tip Error (MLTE)

While X, Y, and theta describe body placement, what actually matters for solder joint quality is where the component terminations end up relative to the PCB lands. IPC-9850 introduced MLTE (Maximum Lead Tip Error) to quantify this.

MLTE represents the maximum deviation at the outermost point of a component’s terminations—the lead tips for leaded components or the outer edge of end caps for chip components. It combines the effects of X, Y, and angular errors into a single metric that directly relates to termination-to-land coverage.

For BGA and CSP packages, IPC-9850 specifies MBTL instead of MLTE, measuring the offset of ball positions relative to land positions.

Accuracy Classes and Coverage Requirements

IPC-9850 defines three accuracy classes based on termination-to-land coverage:

The standard explicitly specifies MLTE and MBTL limits for common component types to achieve these coverage levels:

These values ensure that at least 50% (Class 1/2) or 75% (Class 3) of the termination width overlaps with the land, providing adequate area for reliable solder joints.

Process Capability Index (Cpk)

IPC-9850 uses Cpk to quantify how well a placement machine’s performance fits within specification limits. Cpk accounts for both the spread of placement data (standard deviation) and any offset from center (mean shift).

A machine with Cpk ≥ 1.33 can consistently place components within specification limits with minimal defects. The standard includes spreadsheet tools (IPC-9850-MLTE.xls) for calculating Cpk from measured placement data.

Read more IPC Standards:

IPC Standards Explained: A Comprehensive Guide to PCB & Electronics Assembly Standards

IPC 2615 Standard Explained: PCB Dimensioning & Tolerancing Requirements

MIL-STD-2000A: Military Soldering Standards for Electronic Assemblies

MIL-STD-1686: ESD Control Program Requirements for Military Electronics

IPC 1791 Standard: Everything You Need to Know About Trusted PCB Certification

MIL-STD-883: Complete Guide to Microelectronics Test Methods

J-STD-048 Explained: Complete Guide to Product Discontinuance Notifications

MIL-STD-750: Semiconductor Device Test Methods Explained

MIL-STD-454: General Requirements for Military Electronic Equipment

IPC 9194: Complete Guide to SPC for PCB Assembly Manufacturing

MIL-STD-202: Electronic Component Testing Methods & Procedures

IPC 4110: Complete Guide to Cellulose Paper Specs for Printed Circuit Boards

Boundary Scan Testing (JTAG) in PCB Design: A Complete DFT Guide

Axiomtek IPC-950 Review: Specs, Features & Performance [2026 Guide]

MIL-PRF-55681: Military Ceramic Chip Capacitor Specification Guide

IPC-9850 Test Vehicles and Procedures

The standard defines specific test vehicles and procedures to ensure consistent, comparable results.

Standard Test Panels

IPC-9850 specifies glass panels (200mm x 200mm) with sticky media for placement testing. Using glass instead of actual PCBs eliminates board-related variables, while sticky media holds components in place for measurement without the variability of solder paste.

Standard Test Components

The standard defines specific component types and quantities for testing:

Components are placed in defined patterns, and their positions are measured using an optical CMM (Coordinate Measuring Machine) to determine placement deviations.

Measurement System Analysis (MSA)

Before conducting machine evaluation, IPC-9850 requires verifying that the measurement system itself is capable. This includes GR&R (Gage Repeatability and Reproducibility) testing to ensure measurement variation doesn’t mask machine performance.

IPC-9850 Throughput Measurement

Accuracy alone doesn’t characterize a placement machine—speed matters too. IPC-9850 defines how to measure and report throughput while maintaining specified accuracy.

Components Per Hour (CPH)

The standard specifies throughput as components placed per hour under defined conditions:

This IPC reference speed provides a baseline for comparison, but it’s important to understand its limitations.

The Gap Between IPC-9850 Speed and Real-World Performance

Here’s something every process engineer learns quickly: IPC-9850 throughput numbers rarely match production reality. The standard measures speed under optimized conditions—simple component matrices, optimized feeder positions, gang picking of identical components.

Machine vendors sometimes achieve IPC-9850 speeds using gang picking (multiple heads picking identical components simultaneously), which is rarely possible with real product boards containing diverse component values. The updated IPC-9850A addresses some of these concerns, but users should still expect production throughput to be 30-50% lower than IPC-9850 reference speeds.

IPC-9850 Attribute Defect Testing

Beyond accuracy and speed, IPC-9850 defines methods for measuring attribute defects—the non-positional errors that affect placement quality.

Attribute Defect Categories

Statistical Requirements for Defect Rate Testing

Measuring attribute defect rates requires placing large quantities of components to achieve statistically meaningful results:

Attribute defect testing is resource-intensive but provides crucial data for high-volume manufacturing where even low defect rates translate to significant quality costs.

IPC-9850 vs IPC-9850A: Key Differences

The 2011 revision (IPC-9850A) introduced several improvements over the original 2002 standard:

Despite improvements, IPC-9850A adoption has been slower than expected. Some manufacturers continue reporting performance to the original standard because IPC-9850A conditions produce lower (more realistic) throughput numbers.

Using IPC-9850 for Machine Selection

When evaluating placement equipment, IPC-9850 data should be part of a comprehensive assessment:

What to Request from Vendors

Conducting Your Own Verification

IPC-9850 also provides methods for incoming inspection and periodic verification:

Establishing baseline IPC-9850 data at installation gives you a reference point for tracking machine degradation over time.

Useful Resources for IPC-9850 Implementation

Official Standard and Documentation

Test Materials and Equipment

Related IPC Standards

Frequently Asked Questions About IPC-9850

What is the difference between accuracy and repeatability in IPC-9850?

Accuracy describes how close the average placement is to the target position—it reflects systematic offset. Repeatability describes how consistent placements are around that average—it reflects random variation. A machine can have excellent repeatability but poor accuracy if it consistently places components with an offset. IPC-9850 captures both through mean and standard deviation statistics, and both contribute to the Cpk calculation. For production, you need both: repeatability ensures consistent results, while accuracy ensures those results are centered on target.

Why does IPC-9850 use sticky media instead of actual PCBs?

Sticky media on glass panels eliminates variables that would mask true machine performance. Actual PCBs introduce variation from board flatness, warpage, fiducial quality, and land position accuracy. Solder paste adds more variables from print quality and paste rheology. By placing on sticky media, IPC-9850 isolates the placement machine’s contribution to process variation. Experience shows that machines performing well on sticky media also perform well in production, but the reverse isn’t necessarily true—production boards can hide machine problems that sticky media testing reveals.

How often should I verify my placement machine to IPC-9850?

Most manufacturers recommend quarterly verification for high-volume production equipment. However, the appropriate interval depends on your quality requirements and machine utilization. High-reliability applications (aerospace, medical) may warrant monthly verification. Lower-volume operations might extend to semi-annual testing. Additionally, verification should occur after any major maintenance, component crashes, or when quality metrics indicate potential machine degradation. Establishing trend data from regular verification helps predict when maintenance is needed before quality suffers.

Can IPC-9850 throughput numbers be achieved in real production?

Generally, no. IPC-9850 throughput represents optimized conditions that rarely exist in production. Real-world factors like diverse component mixes, complex board layouts, feeder constraints, and the inability to gang-pick typically reduce actual throughput to 50-70% of IPC-9850 reference speed. Some well-designed machines can approach or even exceed IPC-9850 speeds on specific applications, but this requires careful line balancing and setup optimization. Use IPC-9850 throughput for comparing machines under equal conditions, not for production capacity planning.

What Cpk value should I require for fine-pitch components?

For fine-pitch components (0.5mm pitch and below), most quality-focused manufacturers require Cpk ≥ 1.33 as a minimum, with 1.67 preferred for critical applications. At Cpk = 1.33, you’re running about 66 ppm outside specification limits—acceptable for many applications. At Cpk = 1.67, defect rates drop to less than 1 ppm. For ultra-fine-pitch (0.4mm and below) or high-reliability applications, pushing for Cpk ≥ 2.0 provides additional margin against process drift and ensures consistent first-pass yields.

Conclusion

IPC-9850 provides the common language for specifying, comparing, and verifying SMT placement equipment performance. While no standard perfectly captures real-world production conditions, IPC-9850’s standardized approach removes the ambiguity that made equipment comparison nearly impossible before 2002.

For process engineers and equipment purchasers, understanding IPC-9850 metrics—particularly MLTE, Cpk, and the relationship between accuracy and throughput—enables informed equipment decisions. For quality engineers, the verification procedures provide objective methods for acceptance testing and ongoing machine qualification.

The standard isn’t perfect. IPC-9850 throughput numbers remain optimistic compared to production reality, and some vendors still report to the older 2002 standard rather than IPC-9850A. But having a common benchmark, even an imperfect one, beats the alternative of incomparable vendor-specific claims.

When evaluating your next placement machine purchase or verifying your existing equipment, IPC-9850 should be part of your toolkit. Request IPC-9850A data from vendors, understand what the numbers mean, and don’t hesitate to conduct your own verification testing. The investment in understanding and applying this standard pays dividends in equipment selection decisions and ongoing quality assurance.