Inquire: Call 0086-755-23203480, or reach out via the form below/your sales contact to discuss our design, manufacturing, and assembly capabilities.
Quote: Email your PCB files to Sales@pcbsync.com (Preferred for large files) or submit online. We will contact you promptly. Please ensure your email is correct.
Notes: For PCB fabrication, we require PCB design file in Gerber RS-274X format (most preferred), *.PCB/DDB (Protel, inform your program version) format or *.BRD (Eagle) format. For PCB assembly, we require PCB design file in above mentioned format, drilling file and BOM. Click to download BOM template To avoid file missing, please include all files into one folder and compress it into .zip or .rar format.
Choosing between TTL vs CMOS logic families remains one of the fundamental decisions in digital circuit design. Whether you’re designing a simple logic interface or selecting components for a complex embedded system, understanding these two technologies helps you make informed choices that affect power consumption, noise immunity, speed, and overall system reliability.
I’ve worked with both transistor transistor logic (TTL) and CMOS devices across countless projects—from industrial control systems requiring bulletproof reliability to battery-powered IoT devices demanding ultra-low power consumption. Each technology brings distinct advantages that make it better suited for specific applications.
This guide covers everything you need to know about TTL vs CMOS: how they work, their electrical characteristics, voltage level specifications, interfacing techniques, and practical selection criteria for your designs.
Transistor transistor logic, commonly abbreviated as TTL, is a digital logic family built from bipolar junction transistors (BJTs). Texas Instruments introduced the original 7400 series TTL in 1964, and it quickly became the industry standard for digital logic design.
The name “transistor transistor logic” comes from the circuit topology where transistors perform both the logic function and the signal amplification. In a TTL gate, bipolar transistors with multiple emitters handle the input logic, while additional transistors provide output drive capability.
TTL Circuit Structure
A basic TTL NAND gate contains several key elements:
Multi-emitter input transistor for logic function
Phase splitter transistor for signal inversion
Totem-pole output stage with two transistors
Internal biasing resistors
The totem-pole output configuration allows TTL to both source and sink substantial current, making it capable of driving heavier loads than many competing technologies of its era.
TTL Logic Family Variants
Family
Prefix
Power (mW/gate)
Propagation Delay
Notes
Standard TTL
74xx
10
10 ns
Original family
Low Power
74Lxx
1
33 ns
Reduced power, slower
High Speed
74Hxx
22
6 ns
Faster, more power
Schottky
74Sxx
19
3 ns
Schottky diodes prevent saturation
Low Power Schottky
74LSxx
2
9 ns
Best compromise, very popular
Advanced Schottky
74ASxx
8.5
1.5 ns
High performance
Advanced Low Power Schottky
74ALSxx
1.2
4 ns
Modern TTL choice
Fast
74Fxx
5.5
3 ns
Advanced Schottky variant
The 74LS (Low Power Schottky) series became the most widely used TTL family due to its excellent balance of speed, power consumption, and cost. Many legacy systems still use 74LS devices, and they remain available from major distributors.
What is CMOS Logic?
CMOS stands for Complementary Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor, describing both the transistor technology and the circuit topology. CMOS logic uses pairs of complementary n-type and p-type MOSFETs (Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Field-Effect Transistors) arranged so that one transistor is always off when the other is on.
Introduced in 1968, CMOS initially targeted low-power applications like digital watches and calculators. As manufacturing processes improved, CMOS became faster while maintaining its inherent power efficiency advantage, eventually replacing TTL as the dominant logic technology.
CMOS Circuit Operation
In a CMOS inverter—the basic building block of all CMOS logic:
When input is LOW: PMOS transistor conducts, NMOS is off, output pulled HIGH
When input is HIGH: NMOS transistor conducts, PMOS is off, output pulled LOW
This complementary arrangement means that in static conditions (input not changing), one transistor is always completely off, blocking current flow from supply to ground. Current flows only during switching transitions when both transistors briefly conduct.
CMOS Logic Family Variants
Family
Prefix
Power (Static)
Propagation Delay
Supply Voltage
4000 Series
CD4xxx
10 nW
90 ns
3-18V
High Speed CMOS
74HCxx
2.5 µW
8 ns
2-6V
High Speed CMOS (TTL Compatible)
74HCTxx
2.5 µW
14 ns
4.5-5.5V
Advanced CMOS
74ACxx
2.5 µW
3 ns
2-6V
Advanced CMOS (TTL Compatible)
74ACTxx
2.5 µW
5 ns
4.5-5.5V
Advanced High Speed CMOS
74AHCxx
1 µW
3.7 ns
2-5.5V
Low Voltage CMOS
74LVCxx
1 µW
2.5 ns
1.65-3.6V
The 74HC series matches 74LS TTL speed performance while consuming far less power. The “T” suffix variants (74HCT, 74ACT) feature TTL-compatible input thresholds for easy interfacing with existing TTL systems.
TTL vs CMOS: Key Technical Differences
Understanding the fundamental differences between TTL vs CMOS helps predict behavior in your circuits and avoid common design pitfalls.
Voltage Level Specifications
Parameter
TTL (74LS)
CMOS (74HC at 5V)
CMOS (74HCT)
VIL (Input Low Max)
0.8V
1.5V
0.8V
VIH (Input High Min)
2.0V
3.5V
2.0V
VOL (Output Low Max)
0.5V
0.1V
0.1V
VOH (Output High Min)
2.7V
4.9V
4.9V
Noise Margin Low
0.3V
1.4V
0.7V
Noise Margin High
0.7V
1.4V
2.9V
Notice that standard CMOS (74HC) input thresholds differ significantly from TTL. The input high threshold of 3.5V means a TTL output’s guaranteed 2.7V high level falls in the undefined region—a critical interfacing consideration we’ll address later.
Power Consumption Comparison
Power consumption represents the most dramatic difference between TTL vs CMOS technologies.
Condition
TTL (74LS)
CMOS (74HC)
Static (DC)
2-10 mW per gate
2.5 µW per gate
At 1 MHz
2-10 mW per gate
0.1 mW per gate
At 10 MHz
2-10 mW per gate
1 mW per gate
At 100 MHz
2-10 mW per gate
10 mW per gate
TTL consumes significant power continuously because current always flows through the biasing network regardless of logic state. CMOS draws negligible current in static conditions—power consumption is dominated by dynamic switching losses that increase with frequency.
At low frequencies, CMOS wins decisively. As frequency increases, CMOS power consumption rises proportionally due to charging and discharging internal capacitances. At very high frequencies (hundreds of MHz), CMOS power consumption can approach or exceed TTL levels.
Speed and Propagation Delay
Historically, TTL offered superior switching speed, but modern CMOS has largely closed this gap.
Family
Propagation Delay (typical)
Maximum Frequency
74LS (TTL)
9 ns
40 MHz
74S (TTL)
3 ns
125 MHz
74F (TTL)
3 ns
100 MHz
74HC (CMOS)
8 ns
50 MHz
74AC (CMOS)
3 ns
125 MHz
74AHC (CMOS)
3.7 ns
150 MHz
74LVC (CMOS)
2.5 ns
200+ MHz
Advanced CMOS families like 74AC and 74AHC match or exceed the fastest TTL variants. For new designs requiring high speed, CMOS offers competitive performance with better power efficiency.
Fan-Out Capability
Fan-out defines how many inputs a single output can reliably drive.
Technology
Typical Fan-Out
Notes
TTL (74LS)
10
Limited by output current capability
CMOS (74HC)
50+
Limited mainly by capacitive loading
TTL fan-out is current-limited because each TTL input draws significant current (particularly in the low state). CMOS inputs draw essentially zero DC current, so fan-out is limited primarily by the capacitive load affecting switching speed rather than DC drive capability.
Noise Immunity
CMOS provides substantially better noise immunity than TTL. The wider noise margins—particularly at the high logic level—make CMOS more suitable for electrically noisy environments like industrial facilities.
CMOS noise margin advantage comes from output swings that reach within millivolts of the supply rails. TTL outputs, constrained by the totem-pole topology, swing only to about 0.5V above ground and 2.7V below the supply.
Interfacing TTL and CMOS Circuits
Mixed TTL and CMOS systems are common, especially when maintaining legacy equipment or combining components from different families. Proper interfacing prevents unreliable operation.
TTL Driving CMOS (74HC)
This combination presents the most common interfacing challenge. A 74LS output’s minimum high level of 2.7V falls below the 74HC input’s 3.5V threshold requirement at 5V supply.
Solutions:
Method
Implementation
Advantages
Pull-up resistor
1-10 kΩ to VCC
Simple, low cost
Use 74HCT
Replace 74HC with 74HCT
No external components
Level shifter IC
Dedicated translator
Clean signals
The pull-up resistor works because TTL outputs can sink current in the low state but rely on internal pull-ups for the high state. An external resistor helps pull the output higher when in the high state.
CMOS Driving TTL
This direction is straightforward. CMOS outputs swing rail-to-rail, easily meeting TTL input requirements. The main consideration is ensuring the CMOS device can sink sufficient current for TTL inputs.
74HC outputs can typically drive 10 TTL loads without issue. For driving more loads, use bus-driver versions (74HC244, 74HC245) with enhanced output current capability.
Modern systems often combine 5V, 3.3V, and 1.8V logic. For FPGA interfaces or mixed-voltage systems, Altera FPGA devices and similar programmable logic often require level translation for peripheral connections.
Translation Direction
Recommended Method
3.3V to 5V
74HCT (5V powered with 3.3V input)
5V to 3.3V
Resistor divider, 74LVC with 5V tolerant inputs
Bidirectional
TXB series, GTL series, or discrete FET
Input Handling Differences
How unused inputs are handled differs significantly between TTL vs CMOS and impacts circuit reliability.
TTL Unused Inputs
Unused TTL inputs float high due to internal structure, but this isn’t reliable practice. Best approaches:
Tie unused inputs to VCC through a 1kΩ resistor
Connect to another used input with same logic requirement
Tie directly to VCC for gates with internal input protection
CMOS Unused Inputs
CMOS unused inputs are critical—never leave them floating. The extremely high input impedance allows static charge accumulation that can:
Cause random output state changes
Draw excessive supply current if input settles mid-supply
Potentially damage the gate through latch-up
Always tie unused CMOS inputs to VCC or GND, choosing the level that puts the gate in a known, safe state.
ESD Sensitivity and Handling
The thin gate oxide in CMOS transistors is vulnerable to electrostatic discharge (ESD). Voltages as low as 100V can damage unprotected CMOS inputs, though modern devices include internal protection diodes raising this threshold to 2000V or more.
Aspect
TTL
CMOS
ESD Sensitivity
Low
Moderate to High
Input Impedance
~4 kΩ
>10 MΩ
Static Damage Risk
Low
Requires precautions
Latch-up Risk
None
Possible
When working with CMOS devices, use standard ESD precautions: grounded wrist straps, ESD-safe workstations, and proper storage. Modern CMOS includes robust protection, but respecting ESD handling guidelines prevents subtle damage that may cause field failures.
Choosing Between TTL vs CMOS for Your Design
Practical selection criteria depend on your specific application requirements.
Choose CMOS When:
Battery operation or low power consumption matters
Wide supply voltage range needed (2-6V for 74HC)
High noise immunity required
Maximum integration density important
Designing new products without legacy constraints
Operating at moderate frequencies with power sensitivity
Choose TTL When:
Maintaining or repairing legacy equipment
Need exact drop-in replacement for existing TTL
Require superior ruggedness without ESD precautions
Industrial environments with extreme electrical noise
Interfacing with existing TTL-based systems
Application-Specific Recommendations
Application
Recommended Family
Rationale
Battery-powered portable
74HC, 74LVC
Lowest power consumption
Industrial control
74HCT, 74LS
Ruggedness, TTL compatibility
High-speed digital
74AC, 74AHC
Speed with reasonable power
Mixed voltage systems
74LVC
Wide voltage range, 5V tolerant
Legacy system repair
74LS, 74HCT
Direct replacement
Educational/prototyping
74HC
Widely available, forgiving
Common Logic IC Part Numbers
These standard parts appear frequently in designs using both families:
Function
TTL Part
CMOS Part
Description
Quad NAND
74LS00
74HC00
Four 2-input NAND gates
Quad NOR
74LS02
74HC02
Four 2-input NOR gates
Hex Inverter
74LS04
74HC04
Six inverters
Quad AND
74LS08
74HC08
Four 2-input AND gates
Quad OR
74LS32
74HC32
Four 2-input OR gates
Quad XOR
74LS86
74HC86
Four 2-input XOR gates
Octal Buffer
74LS244
74HC244
8-bit buffer with enable
Octal Transceiver
74LS245
74HC245
8-bit bidirectional buffer
Dual D Flip-Flop
74LS74
74HC74
Two D-type flip-flops
4-bit Counter
74LS161
74HC161
Synchronous binary counter
8-bit Shift Register
74LS164
74HC164
Serial-in, parallel-out
Pin assignments remain identical between TTL and CMOS versions of the same part number, allowing direct substitution with appropriate interface considerations.
Useful Resources for TTL and CMOS Design
Datasheets and Technical Documentation:
Texas Instruments Logic Guide: ti.com/logic
Nexperia 74HC/HCT Family Guide
ON Semiconductor Logic Products
Diodes Incorporated Logic ICs
Reference Materials:
JEDEC Standard 7: Logic IC definitions
TI Application Note SCLA011: HCT Applications
Nexperia HCT User Guide (detailed interfacing information)
Component Distributors:
Digi-Key: digikey.com
Mouser Electronics: mouser.com
Newark: newark.com
Farnell/element14: farnell.com
Design Tools:
TI WEBENCH for logic power analysis
Manufacturer parametric search tools
LTspice for circuit simulation
Frequently Asked Questions About TTL vs CMOS
Can I directly replace 74LS TTL with 74HC CMOS?
Not always directly. While pinouts are identical, the input voltage thresholds differ. 74HC inputs require higher voltage for a valid high level than TTL outputs guarantee. Use 74HCT instead—it has TTL-compatible input thresholds specifically designed for drop-in replacement. 74HCT devices accept TTL input levels while providing CMOS output characteristics and low power consumption.
Why does CMOS consume more power at high frequencies?
CMOS power consumption has two components: static (leakage) and dynamic (switching). Static power is negligible, but dynamic power follows the formula P = CV²f, where C is load capacitance, V is supply voltage, and f is switching frequency. Each time a CMOS output switches, it charges or discharges load capacitance, drawing current from the supply. Higher frequencies mean more switching events per second, proportionally increasing power consumption.
What happens if I leave a CMOS input floating?
Floating CMOS inputs cause serious problems. The extremely high input impedance (exceeding 10 MΩ) allows the input to drift to any voltage based on stray capacitance and noise. If the input settles near mid-supply voltage, both PMOS and NMOS transistors partially conduct, creating a low-impedance path from VCC to ground. This causes excessive current consumption, heat generation, and potentially destructive latch-up. Always connect unused CMOS inputs to VCC or GND.
Is TTL still manufactured and available?
Yes, TTL devices remain in production and widely available, though the selection has narrowed. The 74LS and 74F families are still manufactured by several vendors including Texas Instruments and ON Semiconductor. They’re used primarily for maintaining legacy equipment and in applications where TTL’s ruggedness provides advantages. For new designs, 74HCT CMOS offers TTL compatibility with lower power consumption and is generally recommended unless specific TTL characteristics are required.
How do I interface 3.3V CMOS with 5V TTL?
For 3.3V CMOS driving 5V TTL: Most 3.3V CMOS outputs swing high enough (above 2.0V) to meet TTL input requirements, though verify with specific datasheets. For 5V TTL driving 3.3V CMOS: Use a resistor voltage divider, 74LVC devices with 5V-tolerant inputs, or dedicated level translators. Many modern 3.3V CMOS families (74LVC, 74ALVC) specifically include 5V-tolerant inputs, simplifying mixed-voltage design considerably.
Inquire: Call 0086-755-23203480, or reach out via the form below/your sales contact to discuss our design, manufacturing, and assembly capabilities.
Quote: Email your PCB files to Sales@pcbsync.com (Preferred for large files) or submit online. We will contact you promptly. Please ensure your email is correct.
Notes: For PCB fabrication, we require PCB design file in Gerber RS-274X format (most preferred), *.PCB/DDB (Protel, inform your program version) format or *.BRD (Eagle) format. For PCB assembly, we require PCB design file in above mentioned format, drilling file and BOM. Click to download BOM template To avoid file missing, please include all files into one folder and compress it into .zip or .rar format.